All•
10 min read

Comparison of Buying vs. Building a Referral Program In-House

Should we build a referral program for our SaaS in-house, or should we integrate a solution?

TL;DR
Launching a user-referral program doesn’t have to drain months of dev time. For most SaaS teams, Cello’s plug-and-play referral platform delivers faster setup, built-in fraud protection, automated payouts, and lower ongoing costs than rolling your own solution.

Why even compare Cello with building a referral program in-house?

Growth teams often wonder whether they should invest developer cycles into a custom referral engine or adopt an off-the-shelf platform such as Cello. Time-to-market, legal risk, and the hidden costs of maintenance all play a role. The table that follows breaks down every major factor, from implementation speed to compliance and scalability, so you can decide with confidence.

“By replacing our custom-built referral program with Cello, we increased the performance while drastically reducing the maintenance effort.” Gabriel Kaufmann, Partner Manager at sevDesk

Cello vs. Building In-House: Time, Complexity & Maintenance

Dimension	Using Cello (Referral Platform)	Building In-House
Implementation Time	< 1 Week: Drop-in widget and a few lines of code.	3–6 Months: Design, database architecture, coding, and testing.
Engineering Complexity	Low: Backend logic, payouts, and tracking are handled via API/SDK.	High: Requires deep knowledge of attribution, edge cases, and security.
Customization Options	Visual & reward settings configurable via dashboard; branding and copy editable.	Unlimited, but every custom feature must be coded and QA-tested.
Compliance & Legal	Managed: GDPR/CCPA, KYC, and tax forms handled out-of-the-box.	Your Risk: You are liable for data privacy, tax reporting, and collecting tax IDs.
Fraud Detection	Automated: Algorithms flag self-referrals and suspicious patterns.	Manual: You must build rules, monitoring dashboards, and appeal processes.
Reward Tracking & Payouts	Automatic: Cash, credit, or gift cards sent instantly.	Manual: Often requires finance team intervention; high risk of errors.
Analytics & Reporting	Built-in dashboard with metrics, top referrers, and ROI.	Requires separate BI work or analytics integration.
Maintenance & Updates	Included: Vendor handles bug fixes, upgrades, and patches.	Your Cost: Ongoing dev resources required for upkeep and scaling.
Cost Structure & ROI	Performance-Based: Success-based pricing; low/zero upfront risk.	High CapEx: Expensive developer salaries upfront + hidden maintenance OpEx.
Scalability	Cloud infrastructure scales automatically to millions of users.	Must architect for traffic spikes and global growth on day one.
User Experience Quality	Polished UI/UX, one-click sharing, multi-language support.	Depends entirely on internal design and dev bandwidth.

Cello vs. Building In-House: Effort, Time, and ROI

There is no point in spending months in developer efforts building a referral engine, only to find out that your customers are not interested in referring your product. By using an external referral software such as Cello, you can test the channel risk-free (with Cello's all-features, freemium tier) and test before investing more resources. Speed of experimentation is what sets the best growth teams apart.

The timeline below compares the time consumed building a referral marketing program in-house and integrating Cello. Integrating can help you save a significant amount of time, resources, and most importantly, focus.

If Built In-House (typically 3-6 months)

Weeks 1-2: Budget sign-off & resource planning.
Weeks 5-10: Wireframing, PRDs, and database scoping.
Weeks 11-14: Drafting Terms of Service, fraud rules, and payout logic.
Weeks 15-22: Building the ledger, integration with Payment Gateways (Stripe/Paddle), and QA.
Weeks 23-26: Designing emails, widget UI, and frontend integration.
Week 27+: Launch, hotfixes, and "Day 2" firefighting.
Ongoing maintenance & reporting

Integrating Cello (Live in ≈5 days)

Day 1: Technical run-through, finalizing rewards & localization.
Day 2: Drop in the Referral Component & connect Webhooks.
Day 3: Staging tests & configuring reward pipelines.
Day 4: Production tests & notification setup.
Day 5: Launch.

Cello vs. Building In-House: Referral Program Performance

Building a referral marketing program might seem simple at first, but our users repeatedly tell us about their failed efforts in building an effective referral program in-house. Attribution never works, Zapier + Typeform prototypes break every time, and users never get their rewards. But this is not even the biggest issue.

The hardest part is creating a referral program that performs. There are many variables when it comes to increasing referral performance: things like notification flows, seamless UI/UX flows, picking the right moment to ask for a referral (moments of delight, aha-moment, NPS-survey, etc.), customized landing pages, creating social proof, and many more. The last thing you want is to spend 3–6 months building a referral program in-house, only to find it doesn't perform or deliver a positive ROI.

Instead of figuring out every detail from scratch, you can work with Cello's Customer Growth team, who will give you the right growth recommendations on how to set up the best-performing referral experience. Cello has the most advanced data on referral performance on the market, gathered from our 4 million end users in various software niches.

"Cello's out-of-the-box notification functions and recommendations on improving the referral funnel really moved the needle for our referral program" Osama Altalli, Product Manager at Join

For example, after replacing their in-house solution with Cello, SME accounting platform SevDesk saw a 30% boost in referral program performance within just one month, and now referrals drive >10% of their ARR growth. Softr, an AI-powered no-code app builder, increased their free-to-paid conversion rate 6.5x by migrating their referral program from PartnerStack to Cello.

We've also created our comprehensive guide to B2B referrals with industry legends like Kevin Indig, Kyle Poyar, Aakash Gupta, which you can read here.

The Hidden Trap: Maintenance & Technical Debt

The biggest misconception about building in-house is that the work ends at launch. In reality, launching is just the starting line.

A self-built referral program requires a permanent "tax" on your engineering team's time. If you build it, you must maintain it. Ask yourself if your team has the bandwidth for:

Attribution bugs: Investigating why a specific user didn't get credited when they used an ad-blocker.
Reward disputes: Manually checking database logs when a user claims they referred a friend but "didn't get the money."
API Updates: Rewriting your payout logic when Stripe or PayPal updates their API version.
Fraud Evolution: constantly updating your blocking rules as bad actors find new ways to game your system.
Feature Requests: When Marketing wants to change the reward from "$20" to "20% off for 3 months," do they have to wait 3 weeks for an engineering sprint?

With Cello, these aren't your tickets to resolve. They are ours.

But we want our referral program to feel like part of the product

One of the keys to getting a referral program right is whether it feels like a natural part of the user experience. There are countless "referral widgets" that claim to be plug-and-play with no-code integration, but in the end, what you get is an ugly pop-up that redirects to an external website - completely interrupting the user flow.

At Cello, we've built our product to seamlessly integrate and live inside your product. The goal is native integration that becomes part of your product and design. You can see Cello live within products like Miro, Typeform, VEED, Tally seamlessly integrated into the user journey.

How Typeform integrated their referral program (Source: Cello)

Key takeaways

Speed matters: Cello lets you validate the referral channel in days, not quarters.
Hidden costs add up: Engineering hours spent on compliance, fraud prevention, and analytics often dwarf the licence fee of a specialized platform.
Focus on growth, not plumbing: Outsourcing the referral engine frees your team to build core product features and engage users.

Conclusion: Choose leverage over legacy code

A referral engine is mission-critical infrastructure for viral growth, but it shouldn’t become a never-ending side project.

Cello delivers enterprise-grade referral features, compliance, and analytics right out of the box, while your developers stay focused on product innovation. Unless you have a compelling, truly unique use-case that a platform can’t serve, the faster, lower-risk path is clear: integrate Cello today and start turning happy customers into your best sales team.

Book a demo today and test user referrals completely risk-free.

Can't we just build a simple MVP using Zapier and Typeform?

You can, but it rarely scales. No-code prototypes often fail at attribution (tracking exactly who referred whom securely) and fulfillment (actually paying out rewards). This often leads to angry users who didn't get their rewards and a support nightmare for your team. Cello's freemium tier is often cheaper and more reliable than a "cobbled together" MVP.

What about the data? If we buy Cello, are we locked in?

Not at all. We believe your data belongs to you. Cello provides full export capabilities for your referral data. Because our integration is API-first, "leaving" is as simple as removing the code snippet: you aren't building your entire database architecture around us.

How do you handle tax forms (like 1099s)? Do we have to do that?

This is one of the biggest hidden risks of building in-house. If you pay users more than $600/year in the US, you are legally required to collect tax forms. Cello automates this entirely: collecting W-9s and handling compliance so your finance team doesn't have to chase users for paperwork.

My engineers say they can build this in a weekend. Why shouldn't they?

An engineer can build a link generator in a weekend. They cannot build a fraud-proof, tax-compliant, multi-currency payout system with a native UI in a weekend. The "weekend build" usually turns into a "month-long headache" once the first fraud case or attribution bug appears.

Does integrating Cello affect my site speed?

Cello is designed for performance. Our SDK is lightweight and loads asynchronously, meaning it won't block your core application from loading or slow down your user experience.

My application supports multiple languages. Can Cello handle localization?

Yes. Cello is designed for global products. The referral widget and email notifications support 10 languages out-of-the-box (English, German, Spanish, French, Dutch, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese, Danish, and Slovak). Additionally, Cello can help you add other languages upon request. Furthermore, Cello handles multi-currency payouts, allowing you to reward users in their local currency via PayPal or Wise, removing the headache of currency conversion logic.

We are strictly regulated regarding data privacy. Where is the data hosted?

Cello is a German company (GmbH) and is fully GDPR and CCPA compliant. Unlike many US-based competitors, Cello offers EU-based data hosting, ensuring your user data stays within the European Economic Area (EEA) if required. This is often a mandatory requirement for European SaaS companies.

Can I fully white-label the experience, or will it look like a third-party tool?

Cello is designed to look like your product, not ours. You can customize fonts, colors, and copy to match your brand guidelines. Because the Cello SDK embeds directly into your application (rather than redirecting to an external portal), the experience feels native to your users.

How does Cello prevent users from referring themselves to get rewards?

The platform includes an automated anti-fraud layer. It uses fingerprinting, IP blocking, and velocity checks to flag suspicious activity (like a user creating two accounts from the same device). You can set these rules to auto-block or flag for manual review, ensuring you never pay out for fake referrals.