Cello logo besides Firstpromoter logo

Best FirstPromoter Alternative in 2025: Why SaaS Teams Switch to Cello for User & Partner Referrals

TL;DR

FirstPromoter works well for affiliate tracking but struggles with modern referral needs due to cookie-based tracking and external portals. Cello, a leading FirstPromoter alternative, embeds referrals directly inside your product with server-side attribution and automated in-app engagement, driving higher participation. Its success-based pricing aligns vendor and customer growth incentives for better ROI.

Overview: Why Look for FirstPromoter Alternatives

FirstPromoter is a trusted affiliate tracking tool for SaaS companies, but it was designed primarily for managing affiliate partnerships via browser-based tracking and a hosted promoter portal.

SaaS products increasingly need user-referral solutions that integrate natively into the product experience. FirstPromoter still relies on JavaScript snippets and cookies, making it vulnerable to privacy restrictions and mobile app tracking limits.

Cello solves these challenges with a server-side attribution architecture, an embedded referral UI, and automated in-product journeys that convert more users into active referrers.

Key Insight:

A Forrester study found that visit-to-lead conversion rates can be up to 400% higher for sites with a superior UX.

Cello at a Glance (Best FirstPromoter Alternative)

Definition:
Cello is an in-product referral platform that helps B2B and B2C companies turn users into a customer acquisition engine. Cello is the best FirstPromoter alternative

Core Features:

  • Native Referral Component embedded directly in your app.
  • Server-side attribution via Stripe webhooks and metadata.
  • Data-driven optimization based on millions of referral events.
  • In-app notifications & lifecycle emails to drive engagement.
  • Success-based pricing tied to verified Referral ARR.

Expert Note:

“Cello boosted our referral program with their integrations, automated payouts, and smart notifications.”
Anthony Hanbury-Williams, Growth Lead at VEED

Key Insights:

  • Works across sales-led and product-led motions.
  • Serves both B2B and B2C models.
  • Backed by an active customer success team that co-optimizes incentive structures.

Key Differences: Cello vs FirstPromoter

CategoryCelloFirstPromoter
Integration modelNative Referral Component inside your app; fully branded UI.JS snippet + hosted promoter dashboard.
AttributionServer-side (webhooks + metadata) → deterministic tracking.Client-side cookies → vulnerable to blockers.
User experienceSeamless in-app referral flow.External portal (or iframe) for link management.
NotificationsBuilt-in in-app alerts, callouts, and referral emails.Email notifications only.
PayoutsAutomated, in-app reward collection and payout.Manual or PayPal-only bulk payouts.
Pricing modelSuccess-based on verified Referral ARR.Fixed monthly tiers.

Key Insight:

Cello embeds where referrals happen—inside your product—while FirstPromoter redirects users outside it.

How Cello Delivers Higher Referral Performance

Direct Answer:
Cello achieves superior referral results by using data-driven UX patterns refined across millions of referral interactions, then tailoring incentive and engagement design through a customer success partnership.

How It Works:

  1. Proven UX library: Cello’s referral component integrates optimized share flows, referral progress tracking, and incentives directly in-app.
  2. Behavioral journey engine: In-app nudges and follow-up emails trigger at key points (e.g., “share link,” “reward earned,” “payout pending”).
  3. Performance optimization: Customer Success teams continuously work and suggest improvements based on data analysis to improve Referral ARR.

Industry Context:
After switching from PartnerStack to Cello, Softr, an AI-powered no-code app builder, achieved a 7.5× higher paid conversion rate, proving Cello delivers dramatically better referral performance.

Key Insights:

  • In-product visibility drives sustained sharing behavior.
  • Coordinated in-app + email touchpoints increase completion rates.
  • Success-based pricing ensures both vendor and client focus on ROI.

Technical Comparison: Attribution, Integration & Payouts

Attribution Accuracy

  • Cello: Server-side architecture links referral metadata in Stripe Customer/Checkout objects, then validates conversions through webhooks. This ensures reliable tracking across browsers, devices, and mobile apps.
  • FirstPromoter: Relies on client cookies (_fprom_ref, _fprom_tid) and matching email or UID fields in Stripe events. Tracking can fail if scripts are blocked or users clear cookies.

Key Insight:

Server-side attribution is immune to browser privacy features (ITP, ad blockers), making Cello significantly more accurate for user referrals.

Integration & UX

  • Cello: Offers SDKs for web, iOS, and Android. Developers can add the referral component and connect backend events within hours.
  • FirstPromoter: Integration via fpr.js and REST API; UI remains hosted externally, requiring additional dev work for embedding.

Payout Automation

  • Cello: Automates payout initiation; users choose PayPal or Venmo (in the US only), in-app.
  • FirstPromoter: Aggregates commissions but requires manual or bulk PayPal payouts.

Pricing and Alignment With Growth

Direct Answer:
Cello’s pricing scales with Referral ARR, aligning vendor incentives directly with customer success.

  • Free for the first $5,000 in Referral ARR.
  • Transparent usage-based tiers beyond that.
  • No feature restrictions or per-seat limits.

In contrast, FirstPromoter charges flat monthly fees starting at $49/month, regardless of performance, with feature gating across plans.

Key Insights:

  • Cello aligns pricing with measurable growth outcomes.
  • Eliminates upfront risk for startups and mid-market SaaS.
  • Encourages long-term partnership focused on ROI.

Real-World Use Cases

B2B SaaS Example:
Smoobu, B2B SaaS vacation rental management system, integrated Cello, which led to a consistent 10% monthly additional New ARR from user referrals alone. Read more about it in our Smoobu CS story.

Consumer App Example:
VEED, a leading AI-powered online video editing platform, implemented Cello and saw a -90.4% Customer Acquisition Costs for referrals compared to paid channels. They rolled out customer referrals across 1.3M enabled users. Read more about it in our VEED CS Story.

Summary: Key Takeaways - Why Cello is the best FirstPromoter Alternative

Proven data from millions of referral events drives continuous optimization and higher ROI.

Cello is the leading FirstPromoter alternative for 2025, purpose-built for user referrals rather than affiliate tracking.

It embeds natively in your product, creating seamless referral UX.

Server-side attribution delivers unmatched accuracy and reliability.

Pricing aligns with Referral ARR, ensuring shared growth incentives.

What makes Cello better for user referrals than FirstPromoter?

Cello’s in-product component removes friction, while its server-side attribution ensures accurate tracking. FirstPromoter’s affiliate-style setup relies on external portals and client cookies.

Does Cello work for sales-led and PLG companies?

Yes. Cello supports both go-to-market models across B2B and B2C verticals.

How is attribution handled differently?

Cello uses Stripe metadata and webhooks for deterministic attribution; FirstPromoter relies on client-side cookies that can be lost or blocked.

Can users manage payouts inside the app?

Yes. Cello embeds payout settings and redemption options directly in-app. FirstPromoter’s payout process occurs in its external dashboard.

How much does Cello cost?

Free up to $5,000 in Referral ARR, then pay-as-you-grow. Check our pricing page for more pricing information.